I see this opinion fairly often in discussions of Cutlist. Having different layouts automated, means you can quickly see which layout will be easiest to tweak.I should comment on Dave and Jim's opinion about selecting wood grain. In a lot of cases, you will have to manipulate the layout yourself to make best use. Adding in Grain direction makes it a lot harder to come up with a suitable layout.This way, you make it display what is best for you. Having a program decide for you what the ‘best’ layout is, quite frankly doesn’t work. Sometimes you want to have a long skinny offcut to use elsewhere, but sometimes you want as large a rectangle as possible. I realised early on that having multiple options when laying out panels was a real bonus.You save a little bit of wood, but lose a lot of your time, no good. These are much harder to cut as they generally require a jigsaw – which means you need to cut again to square up the edges afterwards. Fit It was created to save time as well as money. The layouts it creates are made in such a way that you will always be able to cut the panels you need using a tablesaw or circular saw – basically a straight cut from edge to edge each time.While more space efficient layouts can be made, they end up looking like a game of tetris, panels are just jammed in everywhere.Why doesn’t Autosort just give me the most efficient layout possible? (Why do I have to keep clicking it? I’d love to say that 2022 is the year I finally release Version 2.0, but at this point in time, that’s unlikely. Each time I try though, life gets in the way and I have to shelve it. I’ve tried multiple times to ‘reboot’ Fit It, by turning it into a web based application rather than a Java one. What will happen to Fit It in the future? It has helped many people over the years, and I’m exceedingly proud of it.įit It loaded with a layout that handles both sheetgoods and lengths of pine in the one project. There are still issues and limitations in it, as there are in any programs, but nothing major. It took a couple months more work to make it into a ‘real’ program, one that works consistently across platforms and screen resolutions, that has features and functions that a normal user would expect, and essentially is an enjoyable experience to use. Still, it did save me money when building a couple of Mega Shoe Boxes. Maybe not a crazy amount of code, but I spent days rewriting functions over and over again, until I got them as efficient as I could.Īfter a couple of weeks I had the main heart of the program sorted, but it was a bare bones program that really only worked for me because I was happy to put up with the crappy gui and lack of features. It is by far the most ambitious program I’ve ever created, clocking in at close to 4000 lines of code. It took about 3 months of coding to get it to a stage where I considered it ‘release ready’. I had the idea early in 2015, but I couldn’t start working on it until March. I realised a lot of my offcuts could be avoided if I made better use of my stock, hence, Fit It! I hate wasting money! When I throw away offcuts, I feel like I’m throwing away money.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |